Contact: +1 213 261 7589 | | More Contact Details | Not for profits click here

Performance League tables - Top 10s

Total Savings by Member The total value (£) of procurement and waste avoidance. This measure illustrates how much each memebr in each organisation has saved while they have been using the Warp It system. The longer the organisation has been on the system the higher the savings, generally. Use this metric to better understand how the length of time a system has been operating, and the relative time to achieve behaviour change in the staff body affects savings.
Click on this icon to view in depth details of how the savings are worked out

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place Jessica Ingram Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £762857
2nd Place David Henderson University of Glasgow £489187
3rd Place Mary Gill University of Tasmania £363587
4 Christine The University of Queensland £323399
5 Estates Facilities Team Nottingham Trent University £304374
6 Edgar University College London £240539
7 Andrew Mouat Glasgow City Council £240354
8 Alexander Ford The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust £219767
9 Katherine McConnell Griffith University £199124
10 Paul Britton University of Salford £183116

Total Savings The total value (£) of procurement and waste avoidance. This measure illustrates how much each organisation has saved while they have been using the Warp It system. The longer the organisation has been on the system the higher the savings, generally. Use this metric to better understand how the length of time a system has been operating, and the relative time to achieve behaviour change in the staff body affects savings.
Click on this icon to view in depth details of how the savings are worked out

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place University College London £2504330
2nd Place University of Kent £1478494
3rd Place University of Glasgow £1341563
4 University of Tasmania £1327718
5 University of Cambridge £1245341
6 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £1009833
7 The University of Queensland £994849
8 Griffith University £790268
9 Hywel Dda University Health Board £738815
10 University of Nottingham £699303

Total Savings Per Month The total savings per month is total savings divided by the number of months the organisation has been using the system. This metric better reflects the actual relative performance of an organisation. Use this metric to estimate how much you might save per month in a highly functioning system.
Click on this icon to view in depth details of how the savings are worked out

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place Griffith University £49392
2nd Place Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £38840
3rd Place University College London £15555
4 Cardiff University £13117
5 University of Kent £12119
6 University of Tasmania £11348
7 East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust £10991
8 University of Glasgow £9316
9 University of Cambridge £9024
10 The University of Queensland £8651

Return On Investment This metric shows how many times an organisation has saved the amount invested in the system over the year/s. That is - how many times the system has paid for itself. Use this metric to get a insight into how likely it is that the system will be financially risk free for your organisation!
Click on this icon to view The price for a Warp It subscription

PlaceOrganisationROI
1st Place University College London 601.42 x
2nd Place University of Kent 519.86 x
3rd Place University of Tasmania 466.85 x
4 University of Glasgow 322.18 x
5 University of Cambridge 299.07 x
6 Griffith University 277.87 x
7 The University of Queensland 238.92 x
8 Queen's University Belfast 219.79 x
9 The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust 214.63 x
10 University of Reading 187.03 x

Carbon Saved Click on this icon to view an explanation of this metric

PlaceOrganisationCO2 Savings KG
1st Place University College London 1284917
2nd Place University of Kent 783404
3rd Place Hywel Dda University Health Board 708105
4 University of Cambridge 663840
5 University of Glasgow 653408
6 City of Edinburgh Council 585279
7 University of Tasmania 545778
8 The University of Queensland 503066
9 Griffith University 343979
10 University of Nottingham 315854

Waste Avoided Click on this icon to view an explanation of this metric

PlaceOrganisationWaste Avoided KG
1st Place University of Kent 285236
2nd Place University of Glasgow 244499
3rd Place Hywel Dda University Health Board 192074
4 City of Edinburgh Council 176094
5 University of Tasmania 167376
6 University College London 157369
7 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure 126437
8 Griffith University 124531
9 University of Cambridge 115353
10 The University of Queensland 111339

Total Members This metric is the number of members each organisation has on their Warp It portal. As you can see the more members an organisation has the more likelihood that they will have an effective system.

PlaceOrganisationTotal Members
1st Place South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust 5081
2nd Place University College London 5005
3rd Place University of Cambridge 3216
4 NHS Grampian 3179
5 University of Oxford 2480
6 Imperial College London 2299
7 University of Reading 2143
8 The University of Queensland 2038
9 The University of Leeds 1997
10 University of Glasgow 1966

Trades Per Month This metric is a reflection of the average number of trades a month. As you can see the higher number of trades generally means higher savings. However this is not always the case as many organisations use the system to trade low value but high volume items like stationery.

PlaceOrganisationTrades Per Month
1st Place Griffith University 96
2nd Place LEICESTERSHIRE PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST 69
3rd Place Hywel Dda University Health Board 47
4 University of Kent 47
5 East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust 36
6 University of Glasgow 34
7 University of Tasmania 28
8 University College London 27
9 Cardiff University 25
10 The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust 23

Savings Per Member This metric shows the value that each member can bring to your organisation. Use this figure to work out what your savings might be if you can get say, 500 staff onto your system. Or 1000! Or 10,000!

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place University of Strathclyde £7778
2nd Place West Midlands Police £5610
3rd Place Glasgow City Council £3375
4 British Heart Foundation £3367
5 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £2376
6 Stevenage Bioscience Catalyst £2219
7 University of Technology Sydney £2116
8 An Post £1448
9 Northern Ireland Schools £1178
10 Griffith University £1162

Donated To Charity This metric shows the top 10 donating organisation and the value of goods they have passed to charity.

PlaceOrganisationDonated To Charity
1st Place Hywel Dda University Health Board £583109
2nd Place City of Edinburgh Council £532993
3rd Place Derbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation Trust £256572
4 University College London £232419
5 University of Glasgow £194757
6 University of Kent £144914
7 Royal Devon University Healthcare £105724
8 University of South Wales £72475
9 Swansea University £71818
10 Aberdeenshire Council £71746

Quickest Payback This metric shows the top 10 organisation who achieved payback quickest. That is the time it took from signing up to when the system paid the subscription cost. You can use this metric to get an idea on how quickly you might recover your organisation's investment.

PlaceOrganisationNo Of days until payback
1st Place NHS Tayside 9
2nd Place Royal Veterinary College 15
3rd Place The University of Queensland 18
4 LEICESTERSHIRE PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST 30
5 University of Exeter 31
6 University of Technology Sydney 36
7 DORSET HEALTHCARE UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 39
8 City of Parramatta 40
9 Griffith University 40
10 Swansea University 41

Large Charity Donates The following top 10 have achieved the most value items from the system.

PlaceOrganisationAmount Given
1st Place The Edinburgh Remakery £1798053
2nd Place East Midlands Charities £666707
3rd Place Welsh Charities £645571
4 National Charities £580947
5 West Midlands Charities £579233
6 South East Charities £501385
7 Scottish Charities £312469
8 North East Charities £249547
9 Yorkshire Charities £212422
10 City of Edinburgh Council Reuse Partners £193150

Small Charity Donations The following top 10 have achieved the most value items from the system.

PlaceOrganisationAmount Given
1st Place Rom valley based charity £172730
2nd Place Kelso based charity £132766
3rd Place Whitby based charity £90372
4 MANCHESTER based charity £23342
5 Alva based charity £8612
6 Southampton based charity £6390
7 London based charity £6118
8 Lanark based charity £4468
9 Ingleby Barwick based charity £4320
10 Glasgow based charity £3942

What our customers are saying



I love all types of recycling and upcycling - this is a great platform and reduces overall waste to landfill!

Anon, Aston University

Excellent way of distributing goods which are no longer required and cost effective too!

Anon, NHS Grampian

Good service and updated regularly!

Anon, NHS Forth Valley